Media misfiring United Kingdom mingji unveil global journalism shady _ flying legend

It is simply that: a media story just out of the fallen and critical news puppet hands, these news reports of the zombie damn true, just and behind-the-scenes manipulator Mwali. The fact is some reporters really bad: they are moral cowards, a born liar, they seek to pen, love flattering, some reporters drunken sex, some journalists were intelligence agencies and Government departments to buy. One of the above features abound, some of the journalists or even includes all journalists. However, most importantly, a large number of journalists is not the case, they fulfill their duties, although occasionally failed to tell the truth. Imagine if because Jason �� Blair (JaysonBlair) �� the good years behind closed doors, health stories of journalists, you decided that the New York Times reports, this is absolutely useless. Press current problems than these interesting, at the same time, it is even more worrying. An endless stream of people explain why the media fall �� politicians, left-wing militants, right-wing militants, a small group of media scholars and students, thousands of consumers that they don't believe anything they read �� instead, they continuously from its own filter those filled with deception, misrepresentation and clamored to find evidence of coverage. There are a few fair assessment, but criticized the media mainstream opinion is full of misunderstandings. These explanations cannot be established with regard to two reasons. First, a lot of criticism from the media, the outsiders factual basis from other outsiders, on top of this form of theory fully does not apply to news Studio. Second, they are one of the leading media fall significantly interference: the majority of press coverage tends to those wealthy and the interests of those in power. There is also a very popular theory, mass media reported intentionally cater to the tastes of advertisers, or, at least according to the requirements of the advertisers, with some restrictions. With an outsider's perspective, this is the reason. Advertisers have the money, media operation needs money, due to pressure from advertisers, media must compromise, and consistent with the interests of advertisers to describe the world. Such a theory looks impeccable, and much of the left-wing militants. However, the authenticity of this theory is very limited. There is evidence that some large advertisers are left some small media, to influence the reader on a company or an industry perspective. A number of fashion magazines could be a major fashion residential areas reveals the beauty of words, the overflow of the local newspaper of a story will eliminate conflicts between local businesses. One of the most obvious case is the 1999 event of the Los Angeles Times ". The Los Angeles Times of managers and a local playground, the paper only reports on positive news sports fields, sports grounds of operators require its contractors in the Los Angeles Times ads, profit them equally. When critics wearing tinted glasses, try this theory explains the "Flat Earth News" in the flow of global media, these facts clearly outdated. I can think of was, indeed, some companies in media, advertising, to affect the media's political stances and editorial line, but almost no success stories. A famous and typical case is: in 1956, the Observer newspaper wrote an attack (Israel) invasion of Suez (acts), and some support for Israel's advertisers and protest and boycott this newspaper, in an attempt to compel the Observer newspaper changed its position, and it ended in failure. I'm in Fleet Street (especially United Kingdom press) for more than 30 years, never touched the advertisers directly or indirectly affect the editorial position of examples out of witnessing such incidents of journalists. Indeed, such views of critics not find enough evidence. Based on the untenable views, natural media, advertisers know that have their own political interests, therefore, does not require any special advertising customer, stressed that the media will determine first of all, their own newspaper must not offend their "interests", otherwise, can only watch the ads simply slip away. In fact, the news itself has its own rules. News story inevitably how around social development of the political and moral assumptions about the issue. Furthermore, no evidence, however indirect, advertisers can decide the direction of such reports. We all know, journalism, journalists have a different, more powerful news gets the source. If you want to allow advertisers to "Flat Earth News", it is the responsibility of the negligible, has become a real "culprit" fall guy. In fact, big companies, the Group has control over the content of the news report �C but by no means advertising departments took them into the news Studio. Another well-known "conspiracy theory" is that the media owner determines the position of the media and sound, the meek media practitioners will be forced to accept. This is true. Media owners can indeed affect news product editing process. However, this is not as good as those expected outside. From a historical point of view, especially in the beginning of the 20th century, mass media, on the occasion of the birth, development, some of the powers of the individual's coveted crazy acquisitions newspaper, his views on newspapers, modification programme, for his own political career as advocate. Northern rock jazz, United Kingdom modern popular journalism's founder, steeped in the political powers: he not only with newspaper down a Government (by Asquith, 1915 may), and create another Government (by Lloyds �� George leadership in December, 1916), also allow themselves to become Director of propaganda Department of the United Kingdom. His younger brother Ross Melzer (Rothermere) jazz, publicly embraced totalitarian rule, claimed that Hitler was a "great peace", and ordered his daily post closely United Kingdom fascism. Until World War II the "period", his obedient employees still author against Jewish refugees seek asylum in the United Kingdom. Of course, there are several media owners use their wealth protection, support more decent news media, but most of the media owner's behavior and Beaverbrook (Beaverbrook) jazz. Beaver Brook is typical of such person, he elaborated on behalf of their own in the dailyExpress "role:" I operate this newspaper's purpose is to advocate, in addition to this there's sake. "But the situation is changing, media owners are also the same. The Dukes make pie, gesticulating to newspapers, indiscriminate interference newspaper owners have been sold in the hands of the newspaper. Large companies, they are an acquisition, which of course is not a manufacturing inflammatory news, their purpose is simple, it is no doubt that for the money. However, the newspaper business operation to the news industry pressure, as well as the impact on journalism, far surpass newspaper owner on the newspaper's interference. It is these commercial pressure, to report the facts of the news industry brought tremendous obstacles. New newspaper owner on the newspaper's interference significantly less than their predecessors. Most journalists (though not all) will tell you that they never under someone else's instructions to write articles, whether such indication is direct or indirect, whether it be from the newspaper's owner, or his appointed by the Chief Editor. However, this does not mean that the new owner more than his predecessors have news ethics. They do not interfere with important reason: they clearly do the parboiling and no benefits. The benefits of this approach is that a group of newspaper owner appeared �� as long as the newspaper can make money, they right newspaper content, editorial guidelines are of no interest. Canada's Roy �� Thomson (RoyThomson) was the first to win the respect of the owner of the newspaper reporter. He tells the history of Fleet Street "press gang" (PressGang) a book wrote, 1953, Roy �� GE Lin Shi Glade (RoyGreenslade) bought the Scotsman newspaper, this became a United Kingdom media change: "a new generation of signs, distinctive media owners in the United Kingdom was born. They do not follow the traditional, journalism as a political weapon, they are more like a swarm of accounting does not care about politics, the news industry as part of the business. "In the United States, Roy �� Thomson did not mind him in the South of the newspaper supported the black and white ethnic distinction, while northern newspapers are opposed to such practices, as long as they can make money. As the Sunday Times ' owner, Roy �� Thomson more to allow journalists have completely randomly change edit position, political stance of freedom. But the drawback is that newspaper owners continue to intervene on journalism, they interfere with very different from the older, lower frequency. Murdoch is a very successful businessman, who claim to be gentle, ability is strong, in fact it is a bad-tempered, utterly "tyrant". His intervention to the media in three respects: first, and most important, he used his alliance with the media and politicians, in the meantime, politicians will give him the benefit of the business. In his autobiography "the Murdoch Empire" (The Murdoch Archipelago), before the Sunday Times journalist Bruce �� PEC (BrucePage) vividly describes the man's fortune. Murdoch to Adelaide-based, build your own media empire. At that time, he looked all political Union, he and the Deputy Prime Minister of Australia John �� Mike Ewen (JohnMcEwen) "pickup". January 1968, John �� Mike Ewen has encountered a problem. At that time, Australia's Prime Minister Harold �� Holt (HaroldHolt) in Melbourne, near beach swimming is drowned, John �� Mike layoun was chosen as acting Prime Minister. However, he knew he was in the position to stay on for long, because his country Party (theCountryParty), in the coalition Government has only a few seats. New State leaders will be on January 9th, in the largest political party, the Liberal Party. There were two strong candidates: John �� GE's (JohnGorton) and Billy �� McMahon (BilyMcMahon). John �� maceuen hope John �� Koh, the weak, drinking was elected as the life of man, so he difficulty in mind to Billy �� McMahon to cause trouble. John �� maceuen claimed, if Billy �� McMahon was elected, he led the country party to the service will be denied, and refused to explain why. Secretly, John �� maceuen used his powers of the Acting Prime Minister of Australia called security intelligence agency in charge of its investigation, lives in Billy �� McMahon's side, and his relationship with a close colleague Marcos �� Newton (MaxNewton). John �� Mike Ewen, Marcos �� Newton is affected by the potential in Japan, Australia, the deliberate destruction of Australia economy of undercover. This is a lie. However Australia security intelligence agency leader has agreed to this investigation. Survey results have nothing. This let John �� maceuen needles. Four days before the election, is also on the evening of January 5, Bruce �� PEC memories: John �� maceuen let Murdoch to him is to enjoy the Hotel Canberra Ke (HotelKurrajong) apartments, handed him a stack of investigation Billy �� McMahon of treason. Young Murdoch overjoyed. Not only does the work for its political Union, but also against Marcos �� Newton. Marcos �� Newton's former Chief Editor of Rupert Murdoch, and claimed that Murdoch is "from Adelaide's wet behind the ears of children". That night, Murdoch called Marcos �� Newton, a short sentence: "I come from Adelaide's wet behind the ears of children, we recommend that you read my newspaper. "Murdoch's newspapers referred to is the Australia", the second day, the newspaper reported by John �� maceuen wishing to cover all of the content, Marcos �� Newton has denigrated capabilities, while also reducing the Billy �� McMahon was elected Prime Minister. The newspaper is entitled: "why does John �� maceuen to Billy �� McMahon vote: spy" exists between the leaders. Article vivid description, Marcos �� Newton how to dispatch from Japan, in Australia as a spy. This story was invent, perhaps, only Murdoch himself. The article is not signed, the Murdoch's League politicians plotted. 4 days later, accompanied by Australia other media around the Murdoch's exclusive news coverage of the swarm, Billy �� Mike MaA disastrous flood in the general election, John �� Mike Ewen's wishes, John �� GE's elected Prime Minister. A year later, in January 1969, Murdoch made to the overseas expansion of the first step, he would like to high-priced purchase London the news of the world ", but encountered a problem. According to the then Australia currency circulation of the relevant provisions, he cannot bring money to the United Kingdom investment. John �� maceuen Pro application helped him make Prime Minister John �� GE's to their own apartments, John �� GE's "know better", en signed with large sums of cash allowed Murdoch Charter abroad. John �� GE's then asked is: "do you have a whiskey?" in John �� maceuen later recalled: "licence after the check, I went to the garden and Murdoch, John �� GE meal with a bottle of whisky, later, Murdoch is leaved, preparatory to buy newspaper. "This is the man, he used his media recovers politicians, at the same time, he used the politicians of the business of your own favorite expansion. However, Murdoch preference on the wallet than on political concern. He can and a politician, or you can always take him away, all these to viability. ����: ��ˡ���ά˹��Nick Davies�� ���ߣ���Ө��ѡ�ԡ�ý��DZ���򡪡�Ӣ����ǽ���ȫ������ҵ��Ļ�����Ϸ��ձ������缴��¡�س�